According to the Daily Tribune, the company Stanley International Betting brought an action before the Conseil d’Etat. The priority of the English company is struggling to counter the monopoly of the institutions already on the ground to install its own shares of paris sports.
In August last, Stanley International Betting filed this appeal before the State Council with the reasons for the opening of future market paris sports competition that causes a crack in the monopoly of the FDJ and PMU.
Advocate Asim Singh cabinet Alerion, serving society Staley International betting indicate that “The monopoly is broken on the Internet. We therefore see no reason why he would remain in the physical network. According to the legislature, overriding interest, such as the fight against fraud, justify the monopoly. This seems disproportionate. There are other ways to protect the public. ”
Stanley International Betting is still one of the largest British bookmakers, the company is also listed on the London Stock Exchange. This company in a manner efficient enough to make the recordings of Paris, the players are among the premises open to the public, the Paris will be recorded and then be transferred through the telecom network on the server based at Stanley United Kingdom .
In 2009, the public will almost 9.9 billion euros, including 783 million euros for peer athletes! Among these figures we see that 741 million euros have been staked by punters on their way to physically do paris cons 43 million euros from the Internet.
The British company then wants to stand up to JDF by becoming a direct competitor and is looking to establish centers of Paris in France even sports, but the chances of the company they are to live up to expect an outcome? ”
Also remember last year when the Lottery was facing Portuguese Bwin, the European Court of Justice Santa Casa, which has just approved the rights of states to organize the market for gambling and Paris as they see fit. Regarding the English society, its advocates emphasize the importance of the risks this case potentially more dangerous to consumers of gambling on the internet compared to the traditional game. Finally in Italy the two judgments of 2003 and 2007 that prohibited private companies to install physical networks have been challenged by the steps taken by the Stanley Company. Master Asim Singh declared that “Since then, Italy has changed its regulations and the company was able to settle”